December 2010
Well, here we are a year older as a nasty Arctic blast cuts through our workshop reminding us that the ball chasers have missed all the good weather and winter is upon us once more. Our draught excluder went atop the roller-shutter last week meaning no more tea breaks in the street and Carl’s heater has been grafting away to keep the chill off though it’ll likely expire for the want of fuel if our delivery is delayed much longer.
And the rest of the fuel system is well on the way too. This is the CCU or Combined Control Unit in pieces awaiting rebuild and testing.
It wasn’t long in going back together and it’s ready to go now. Amazing or what…
John spent week after week on those start bottles and was finally rewarded with both passing a hydraulic test. We’ve resurrected many of the original, outer body skins too and Mike has made a multitude of historically correct widgets for the cockpit. No one will give a stuff about the ludicrously complex air intake that has almost put us all in the psychiatric ward but the flat instrument panel with holes in will have them all oohing and ahhing… Such is the nature of our mission. I actually started writing this diary entry months ago but it foundered for the want of spare time until Christmas loomed and the clamour for a diary entry grew unbearable. The fact that the original opening line read, “If Emily gets sunburnt is it OK if Susan puts sun-screen on her?” would suggest that the sun was still shining so what can I say except, sorry for the wait. Emily is my youngest and Susan is the child minder and a good rant was due but I was in the midst of trying to sort an evening’s worth of photos of our big tin boat so my missus’ question seemed both stupid and irritating. What sort of fool would allow their kid to burn for the want of a splash of lotion when they’d left the little-un with a childminder in the first place and buggered off to greed for gold? “What? Yes, of course,” I said testily, and went back to the photo organising. I was free for a beat… but then came another. “If she cuts herself is it OK if Susan puts a plaster on?” Now I really thought the wife was taking the proverbial… “Course it bloody is! And should she slash her neck on a collapsing greenhouse and suffer a severe arterial bleed it’s OK to call paramedics and apply pressure to the wound in the meantime too…” I grumpily stuffed more photos into the requisite folders during a slightly longer pause than followed the first question. Then Rachel gently cleared her throat… “If Emily is cheeky do you want Susan to ignore her, chastise her or attempt to reason with her?” I stopped what I was doing and swivelled my chair expecting to find the wife wetting herself at having irritated me out of my male uni-tasking. But she wasn’t. She was filling out a form for the childminder - her mate of old who’d enjoyed both our kids’ Christenings with her own family and looked after our offspring since they were born but was now to be given a few quid for her trouble so the police wanted to know our psychological leanings on discipline. “What kind of stupid bollocks is that?” I demanded… “A checklist for leaving the most precious thing in your life with someone you don’t trust?” Rachel proffered the form but I waved it away, instead firing a question or two to be sure she was serious before voicing my thoughts. “Tell Susan to beat the stroppy little bitch to within an inch of her miserable life if she works her ticket!” I said before going back to my photos. Then I thought, hmmm, maybe I could work that little rant into a piece for the BBP diary. After all, it’s been a while. Trouble is there’s been very little to write about. Oh, I could throw ten thousand words together on how diligently Rob has opened, cleaned and Ardroxed (the verb, to Ardrox) multitudes of frame tubes. Or describe in intimate and excruciating detail every hammer blow on our cockpit panels’ road to recovery but you’d wander off for a cuppa after the first couple of paragraphs. Yet behind the scenes our project continues to evolve and recently we solved a serious problem that has plagued us almost since we started. Rob’s ball-chasing. For the uninitiated, Rob tunes his ‘wireless’ every week to excited commentary on a squad of blokes kicking a ball at some other blokes they kicked it against last year with no variation year on year to keep it even vaguely interesting. It’s painful to say the least and after four years we’d had enough and decided to act. Let’s be reasonable here – the footballists have had plenty of time to introduce a multiball round or a sin-bin or something, anything, to generate new excitement but they seem utterly bereft of imagination and merely repeat the same old drudgery year on year. We’d taken all we could so by the commission of a major fraud we nicked twenty quid from the BBP coffers and bought Rob a pressie. Yes, we promise every penny donated goes straight into the boat, and that’s true. If you don’t believe us then please turn up with your accountant and tidy all our paperwork because it’s currently bursting out of a filing cabinet in my office… But we reckoned on morale being boosted and productivity increasing on a Saturday if only we could be rid of the ball-chasing once and for all.
But all the while the child minder nonsense wouldn’t leave me be... There’d been a few other questions like, was the baby allowed to travel in a car, or use playground equipment, breathe air or go on ‘routine outings’. Sort of depends on what that means, doesn’t it. I mean, it may be routine for the child minder to go get her methadone but I’d not want my kid tagging along. We had no worries about any of that stuff really but, out of curiosity, I eventually asked for the paperwork because I just knew it had to be full of stupid bollocks. I wasn’t disappointed. Here’s a good one for you from the ‘Equality and Diversity Policy’. Our child minder has to, ‘Include all families in her ‘setting’ and not to discriminate against them on the grounds of ability, sexual orientation (I assume this refers to the parents not the kids, though there’s a few scenarios even there I can think of that may take a bit of smiling through), age, class, family status or HIV/AIDS. Now here I draw the line because, sympathetic as I am to those thus afflicted, I certainly don’t want my kid biting, scratching, nipping or violently colliding with another that may be infected with a life-threatening virus. Let’s face it, if you go for an operation in such a condition, not only do the staff kit-in like North Sea divers, they throw the knives and forks in the bin afterwards never to be used again. What we’re facing here is just wholesale, do-good bureaucracy placing your kid in danger for the sake of political correctness. But the do-gooders are rarely content with being stupid once. It’s an inbuilt want in them to repeat it at every turn so if you progress to the ‘Illness and Infectious Disease’ section you’ll soon discover that if a child arrives in your child minder’s ‘setting’ with, a mild dose of the shits they have to be sent home at once and chicken pox means virtual lockdown even though, as everyone knows, by the time the spots break out it’s already past the infectious stage! Change the subject matter and you could easily be reading something written by a museum professional for the Hapless Lottery Failure. Incidentally, as a glimpse into the mind of a child, I was hugely entertained one day when, Lucy, covered in spots, explained that, though she had chicken pox everywhere else, she had only a single ‘chicken pock’ on her face… Obvious, isn’t it. And as if that’s not enough and moving quickly (and finally) on to the, ‘Policy Statement: Behaviour’, our child minder may not administer ‘physical or any other form of punishment with the intention of causing pain or discomfort, nor any kind of humiliating or hurtful treatment’. Anyone still respect the dad who lashed your arse with a slipper? Or is that just me? It also says that ‘punishment is destructive – it humiliates children and makes them feel powerless’. Powerless… and so they bloody-well should be. They’re in the hands of the child minder, for goodness sake – the last thing they need is power! What kind of a ridiculous statement is that? It’s followed by the promise that the child minder will, ‘say no and mean no’. How powerless does that leave your kid? The lunatics have taken over the asylum once again, methinks. But at least we don’t have to put up with any such rubbish at BBP headquarters these days. We plan the strategy, call the shots and do the work and once our cockpit panels were just about ready we spent another twelve quid of your donations having a batch of aerosols of Bluebird-blue mixed too so we could put a guide coat on our cockpit opening. It looked rather tasty.
After a second round of tin-bashing and with a fresh guide-coat we declared the panels essentially finished and about ready for BettaBlast.
Having written all the above nonsense time marched by until we grew tired of battering those panels around and finally threw them into BettaBlast to be painted for better or for worse. They came back (as you’d expect) looking a million dollars and went down effortlessly.
The cockpit opening mobilised an army of pins and took two days to drill, debur and pin down atop a slap of good old choccie sauce. It then took a further day to set the 250-odd rivets that secure those outer skins but doesn’t it look magnificent.
Another task that’s absorbed untold amounts of time is the ongoing rebuild of the air intakes. It’s by far the most complex structure on the boat and was horribly crushed and never built to the drawings anyway so putting it back together again is proper detective work. For example, see that plate trapped under a strip of tin between the clamps with three small tags sticking out along its forward edge?
Yep – the drawing describes a graceful curve all the way over the top but you can’t build a curve into a hinge-line so they simply departed from what was stipulated and built it flat as a billiard table up there. Then they departed similarly whenever something looked tricky on or around the intakes. We discovered rather late in the day, for instance, that achieving the required curvature in the inlet tracts at their entrance involved putting a hell of a lot of shape into the metal. Then we found that, given enough stretch to get the right shape, the wheeled material became critically thin (if you use what’s specified on the drawings) and so work-hardened near the entrances that it was likely to be sucked inside out if not annealed because it doesn’t have a lot of support out there. We looked at using thicker material to keep it safe then went back to the wrecked parts only to find that they’d got around it in 1954 by not bothering with a big swath of metal-shaping then redesigned the inlet mouths to suit. We’d rebuilt the mouths to the drawing by this time (should’ve known better) and made a new inlet duct to match. Argh! We could’ve clashed it all together like that and you might not have noticed but instead we pulled it down and did it again. The duct is constructed from no less than eighteen double-curvature panels all fully welded and dressed into a single, contiguous shape to scoop air from the outside and feed it to the Orph’. I didn’t especially enjoy having to modify that!
Suddenly it all fell into place and everything now matches up – took a long time though.
Firstly, we dressed a 45 degree chamfer on the cut edge to be sure the weld would penetrate right through the bottle wall then set up the two halves in perfect alignment with a few bits of scrap tacked to the sides and bridging the gap so nothing would move.
The process was later proven a complete success when the bottle easily took a hydraulic test beyond any pressure it had ever had to contain and was then allowed a suitably low working pressure for the purposes of starting our engine now and again. Just another thing we were told could not be done. Now that we have both bottles back in action we’ve also been refurbishing all the widgets that go with them. They were held to a frame that straddled the air intake trunk by spider-like steel straps, which had rotted quite badly by the time we turned up.
These long panels have always been referred to as the ‘flutes’ because of their fluted shape and they weren’t in the best of health when we found them.
Having said that, most of the battle scars we’re up against are rather worse than what will fix with only a hammer and the bottleneck in our process has always been the welding dept. Chris comes up from Essex occasionally and does sterling work but from the beginning we’ve had only one welder. That is until now… You see, we have a new trainee on the TIG torch. We call her ‘Girl’.
The story of how Girl showed up, learned the delicate art of TIG welding in an afternoon, then revelled in showing up the boys made the local BBC news so we snaffled it and popped it on YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIIbhEhmDEE
For any late arrivals, LOOF stands for Loss Of Original Fabric, something the Hapless Lottery Failure told us would be an inevitable consequence of our rebuild. They were technically correct, of course, but their failing was to insert the word ‘considerable’ ahead of it thus enabling us to prove them so stupidly wrong that they’ve never lived it down. The question of what will happen to the LOOF, however, (enough material to fill two shoe boxes these days) once we’re done is yet to be settled. The most persistent suggestion is that it’s melted down and cast into tat for the man with more money than sense – cufflinks, tie-pins and all that superfluous nonsense that ought to have died out with the bowler hat. I suppose we should be enamoured with the concept but, to be honest, if I had my way the LOOF would be melted into welding rods so we could put it back again not made into metal widgets to make getting dressed more difficult than it needs to be. How to win sponsors and influence people, eh… And that’s another juggling act. Sponsors… we’ve been mostly supported by relatively small companies up to now whose contribution is equally valued as that of the handful of aerospace giants rebuilding our systems and trolling their archives for half-century-old data and drawings. Without one and all we’d be having a hell of a time and those individuals and companies with vision and patience deserve to have their corporate names sung from the rooftops when our big tin boat is wheeled into the sunlight. They’ve not put a single penny into the effort, nor would we ask them, because their faith is beyond price. The world knows we’ve brought our project this far hand to mouth but a new phenomenon is now manifesting itself – like predators slowly circling – we’re beginning to hear from those scenting the air for an easy kill. The grand finale of ten years hard work is in view and suddenly all kinds of belated, would-be benefactors are slithering out of the woodwork seeking our association. Where were they five years ago? Never mind – better late than never, but it’ll be damned expensive to buy a space alongside the likes of BettaBlast. Another of my favourites is Rolls-Royce. Now let me make it absolutely clear that R-R do not support the Bluebird Project in any way. Strange thing is though, that whatever we ask for seems to mysteriously materialise from the least expected quarter. We’ve maintained dialogue with the good people at R-R since 2002 and they’ve always assured us that support for ‘legacy engines’ will not be forthcoming yet ask for engine data or a rebuild manual and, despite being handed the ‘legacy engine’ tale time and again, said data or item invariably appears from somewhere least expected shortly afterwards. Now this may all be coincidence and I’m sure that, if pressed, they’d tell us that’s all it is, but I’ll forever harbour the romantic conviction that Rolls-Royce moves in even more mysterious ways than God… Which leads us nicely into Christmas and the fact that soon we’ll enter 2011 excited at the prospect of finally putting K7’s clothes back on, filling her belly with machinery and building a pair of brand-new sponsons; we’re well on our way. We also have to negotiate terms then officially donate our portion of K7 to the museum in order to ensure her long term future and, (assuming our bureaucrat-speaking operations wizards can swing our permission to break the speed limit), we’ll have to begin writing the documents pertaining to screaming down Coniston Water, centre stage, in the interests of pure exhibitionism with the world’s media watching – gulp! Thanks to one and all for staying with us. From those who’ve followed us for ten years to those newly arrived… we really are on the home straight now. Merry Christmas.
Welcome to the Bluebird Project website…
Wasn’t that just the most amazing little documentary, but did you know we aired another on BBC1 way back in 2001 on election night about raising the wreck? That’s how long we’ve been working on this project yet you’ve arrived almost at the grand finale… It actually goes back further again because it took us four years to locate Bluebird on the bed of Coniston Water before we could even think of recovering her. Now here we are a decade later and, just as the Bluebird Project was the first team of sports divers to roll up with sidescan-sonar, the Sky News graphics team is the first to attempt the complex task of modelling the accident in such detail. And what a fantastic job they’ve done! Our historian-in-residence, Neil Sheppard, and his team have done extraordinary work in unravelling the detail and causes of the accident whilst the Bluebird Project (BBP) team have analysed events following that crushing impact in microscopic detail. So as a little extra to the film here’s a few screen grabs and a word or two of explanation from the experts at the heart of this effort. Bluebird historian Neil Sheppard explains…
Seconds from impact, Bluebird's starboard sponson bounces clear of the water for the last time. She is now decelerating quite quickly, having reached her peak speed of 328 mph just over 2 seconds before. (The speed here on the frame should actually read about 305 mph.)
5.21 As a precursor to her final flight, the bows of Bluebird are now out of the water. She continued in this attitude for about 2 seconds before the air final got under her and she left the water for the last time. (Again the speed should be about 10mph faster)
Bluebird launches herself into the air. The lack of disturbance under the engine jet pipe indicates that her engine was no longer producing any thrust. Campbell had lifted off or the engine had cut out just after the 3rd bounce, which coincided with the peak speed of 328 mph. As the forward inertia bled away, so did the down force on her bows. (The speed is too low again... should be approx 285 mph)
Bluebird inverted. She climbed to a maximum height of only some 40 feet, during her summersault before hitting the water at an angle of approx. 45 degrees.
Bluebird about to strike the water with terrible force at about 184 mph.
* So far as the Bluebird Project rebuild team is concerned the story began at this point in time and space as Bluebird impacted the water… Bluebird Project leader, Bill Smith takes up the story.
In the split second before Bluebird impacted she rolled and yawed left, striking first with her left-hand sponson. The forward spar was twisted out of her nose and the opposite sponson smashed down a fraction later giving the impression that she landed level.
But nothing would now stop the centre hull from continuing its roll until inevitably smashing into the unyielding water surface on its left-hand side – the forward third coming to a standstill while the remainder rolled over the top of it, yet to surrender its considerable energy.
The cockpit broke from the main hull at frame 15 – the back of the pilot’s seat. The heavy, front spar, wrenched from its fixings by the sponsons, glanced off the water like a skimming stone and didn’t splash down again for a further 120 metres.
Bluebird’s front end shattered into a hundred pieces both with the speed and ferocity of the impact and the brittle nature of her materials on that cold, January morning. Her heavy rear section tumbled end over end, spending its energy rapidly.
Her shattered and split hull wallowed a second or two on the surface before quickly covering her wounds in forty-three metres of water and mud for the next three and a half decades. She would lie undisturbed until March 2001 when a cutting-edge sports diving team would once again set eyes on her blue carapace and ultimately lift her gently to the surface. Four years of begging for Lottery funding would result in flat refusal so the project struck out alone in 2006. Since then the volunteer rebuild team have worked nights, weekends and holidays to bring K7 back to life. Industry has helped with materials and services but the project lives from hand to mouth and this is why we need your support. Visit our diary pages to read a story that spans over ten years. Visit YouTube for the latest video of Bluebird’s ongoing rebuild… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kre1w7TthFg …and then please, please, please visit our shop by clicking on the tab above for a look at all the Bluebird Project goodies. Donations are always welcome too for which we’ll write and thank you personally. We rely heavily on the support of enthusiasts and promise that every penny raised goes straight back into the rebuild of this iconic example of British engineering for future generations to enjoy and be inspired by.
Thanks for your interest… The Bluebird Project team.
|