The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

User avatar
Renegadenemo
Posts: 4357
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: N E England
Contact:

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by Renegadenemo » Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:27 pm

that'll need repainted before it goes back on... :lol:
I'm only a plumber from Cannock...

"As to reward, my profession is its own reward;" Sherlock Holmes

Voltaire's apology when he wrote a long letter: "I didn't have time to make it shorter."

User avatar
Mike Bull
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:57 pm

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by Mike Bull » Wed Jun 21, 2017 5:16 pm

Apparently it does have two pumps as you'd expect, and when the Green one failed, the Red one failed to supply pressure, likewise the RAT.

User avatar
Renegadenemo
Posts: 4357
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: N E England
Contact:

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by Renegadenemo » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:03 am

Apparently it does have two pumps as you'd expect, and when the Green one failed, the Red one failed to supply pressure, likewise the RAT.
Would suggest that either the failed pump took something crucial with it when it gave up or it didn't fail at all and the problem lies elsewhere. Keep us posted.
I know it's a smidge off-topic but we have a case going on here at the moment where a surgeon inserted a replacement aortic valve in a patient the wrong way around so instead of opening when it should have it slammed shut and destroyed her heart. Bad day at the office, was that.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-40332761
I'm only a plumber from Cannock...

"As to reward, my profession is its own reward;" Sherlock Holmes

Voltaire's apology when he wrote a long letter: "I didn't have time to make it shorter."

User avatar
Mike Bull
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:57 pm

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by Mike Bull » Sat Jun 24, 2017 7:19 am

...and yet another silly accident on the ground, this time a Thunderbirds F16 which had just landed in Ohio and ended up in this state somehow-

tbirdfinal.jpg

-no, I don't know how the hell that happened, either! Crew trapped for a while but eventually released.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
mtskull
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:32 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by mtskull » Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:09 am

Mike Bull wrote:
Wed Jun 21, 2017 5:16 pm
Apparently it does have two pumps as you'd expect, and when the Green one failed, the Red one failed to supply pressure, likewise the RAT.
I'm very surprised that there isn't a last resort manual pump or, at very least, a cable or linkage system by which the pilot could directly release the uplocks and residual pressure so that the gear free falls down. I don't think I have ever flown an aircraft fitted with retractable undercarriage that didn't have one or the other.
Then again, that is military, rather than civil, aviation philosophy at work: Have a malfunction, abandon the aircraft and the taxpayer buys you a new one. Doesn't work so well for a rare, preserved historic aircraft, though.
Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goals.

User avatar
Richie
Posts: 1037
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:12 pm

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by Richie » Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:11 am

You then run the risk of a partial drop.. i.e. One leg dropping and the other two staying up.


Then your in a world of hurt. In my most humble opinion better to belly land than try with one leg lowered.
Clarence come out ov zat tank at vonz !

User avatar
mtskull
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:32 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by mtskull » Sat Jun 24, 2017 12:46 pm

Richie wrote:
Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:11 am
You then run the risk of a partial drop.. i.e. One leg dropping and the other two staying up.


Then your in a world of hurt. In my most humble opinion better to belly land than try with one leg lowered.
Maybe so in some tailwheel aircraft but with a tricycle configuration, received wisdom has always been that it is better to land on one or two legs than none at all; sufficient control to keep wings, noses, etc. from contacting the ground can be maintained until quite a low speed, which is certainly preferable to allowing parts of the aircraft that are not designed for the purpose to contact the ground at touchdown speed.

Back in the 1990's when I worked for the now-defunct Manx Airlines, there was a spate of incidents involving the BAe ATP fleet: If I remember correctly, there was one nosegear collapse, one nosegear failed to extend and one main gear partial extension. They all landed on what remained, without casualties and without major structural damage.
Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goals.

User avatar
Renegadenemo
Posts: 4357
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: N E England
Contact:

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by Renegadenemo » Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:18 pm

Clearly it can happen even on modern commercial airliners.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKo4Eee7V3s
I'm only a plumber from Cannock...

"As to reward, my profession is its own reward;" Sherlock Holmes

Voltaire's apology when he wrote a long letter: "I didn't have time to make it shorter."

User avatar
mtskull
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:32 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by mtskull » Sun Jun 25, 2017 5:43 pm

Renegadenemo wrote:
Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:18 pm
Clearly it can happen even on modern commercial airliners.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKo4Eee7V3s
I had to google that one; they made a nice job of the landing. A pity about the popped circuit breaker which prevented the alternate landing gear system from working; some airline managers I know would have crucified the Captain for not spotting that and re-setting it.
I would be very interested to know whether they modified the emergency checklist in the aftermath, to read something like:
Gear fails to extend -operate alternate gear extension -does gear extend? -no -check circuit breakers nos. xxx & yyy....
Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goals.

User avatar
Renegadenemo
Posts: 4357
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: N E England
Contact:

Re: The Vulcan XH558 & General Aviation Thread

Post by Renegadenemo » Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:50 pm

I would be very interested to know whether they modified the emergency checklist in the aftermath
Hard to imagine that they wouldn't but humans will still find a way to scupper themselves even with a checklist. There was the Kegworth accident where, had they bothered to read it properly and not thrown their aircraft at the ground, they'd likely have picked up that they'd shut down the wrong engine. Contrast that with Swissair DC10 that caught fire and they sat up there reading checklists instead of throwing it at the ground until they burned to death...

Great friend of mine is the 737 fleet manager for a major airline and a training captain too. He's been in all sorts of scrapes and is always first to fly new routes ahead of scheduled operations but he went completely to pieces when his wife fell pregnant because... there was no checklist!
I had him send the complete 73 checklist from ground checks to startup, takeoff, cruise, landing and shutdown and rewrote it to cover pregnancy and childbirth whereupon there's a massive depressurisation and a new crew member arrives. It described ventral tanks full to bursting and don't even go there where flaps are concerned but it also contained much useful info like, find out where the nearest florists is, pack an overnight bag and take change for parking meters and coffee machines. He loved it and settled right down. :D
I'm only a plumber from Cannock...

"As to reward, my profession is its own reward;" Sherlock Holmes

Voltaire's apology when he wrote a long letter: "I didn't have time to make it shorter."

Post Reply