Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby DamienB » Sat May 19, 2012 4:55 pm

Dangermouse wrote:I cannot believe that anyone calling themselves a "Director of Conservation" would authorise something so daft.


It's mind boggling isn't it. If they have so much money to spare...
User avatar
DamienB
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:57 pm

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Mike Bull » Sat May 19, 2012 7:00 pm

Dangermouse wrote:They're basically exposing part of the hull (which is by all accounts very fragile in places) to an mildly acidic substance for no reason whatsoever.


Ridiculous as the idea is, the jelly at least won't be touching the actual ship- there's a big seal around the hull, as seen here in a pic of mine from a few years back-

P8221014.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"You never had the things you thought you should have had,
and you'll not get them now..."

is mos redintegro
User avatar
Mike Bull
 
Posts: 2897
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:57 pm

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Renegadenemo » Sat May 19, 2012 7:29 pm

Now d'you see why I used to rant on about museologists? The Hapless Lottery Failure was infested with them too. At one point they wanted to fit K7 with a Perspex nose and another time they proposed a fibreglass shell to float her in so the actual hull never got wet. Even they didn't suggest we float her on a million tons of snot.
I'm only a plumber from Cannock...

This is not put on as a public entertainment... it's put on to reach a certain goal.
User avatar
Renegadenemo
 
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: N E England

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Stuart Baker » Sat May 19, 2012 10:49 pm

I'm sure this is just a simple misreading of Edward Lear's Owl and the Pussy Cat - it was the boat that was supposed to be pea green.
Stuart Baker
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:56 pm

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Dangermouse » Sun May 20, 2012 12:53 am

I haven't been in to see SS GB for years now - I think they'd just finished the replica engines last time I went. I visit Bristol pretty often as I like wandering around the old docks with a camera in hand, but the entry prices were a bit eyewatering last time I looked (I doubt there's much more to see than last time!)

The SS America wreck is well-known in shipping circles, I don't think there's much (if anything?) still above water. If the sea were a bit less violent she'd probably make a decent dive site.

As for museologists, those at the NRM particularly annoy me. By most accounts they could have built a replica A3 for the same money that they've pushed into the Flying Scotsman rebuild, or even better given it a rest and overhauled the re-streamlined Duchess of Hamilton instead. Luckily there seems to be slightly more sense with their diesel and electric fleet now, with locos being loaned to groups who'll get them running. The surviving prototype HST power car should be back in action before too long (and thoroughly baffling non-enthusiast visitors to whatever preserved railway it ends up running on!) :lol:
Matt in Mid Wales
Dangermouse
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Dominic Owen » Mon May 21, 2012 1:01 am

Mike Bull wrote:
Dangermouse wrote:They're basically exposing part of the hull (which is by all accounts very fragile in places) to an mildly acidic substance for no reason whatsoever.


Ridiculous as the idea is, the jelly at least won't be touching the actual ship- there's a big seal around the hull, as seen here in a pic of mine from a few years back-

P8221014.JPG


Rain comes down and splashes go up but the seal doesn't.
One by one, the penguins are stealing my sanity...
User avatar
Dominic Owen
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:10 pm

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Mike Bull » Mon May 21, 2012 2:13 am

Jelly doesn't splash, it wobbles! :D
"You never had the things you thought you should have had,
and you'll not get them now..."

is mos redintegro
User avatar
Mike Bull
 
Posts: 2897
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:57 pm

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Dominic Owen » Mon May 21, 2012 3:30 pm

Mike Bull wrote:Jelly doesn't splash, it wobbles! :D


"It must be jelly, coz jam don't wobble like that" :lol:
One by one, the penguins are stealing my sanity...
User avatar
Dominic Owen
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:10 pm

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Renegadenemo » Mon May 21, 2012 6:50 pm

Considering all the crazy rules for disposing of this and that - how d'you get rid of 50,000 litres of unwanted green gunk? I bet it attracted every fruit fly and wasp for a hundred miles around too...
I'm only a plumber from Cannock...

This is not put on as a public entertainment... it's put on to reach a certain goal.
User avatar
Renegadenemo
 
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: N E England

Re: Nomadic, Titanic & other historic vessels

Postby Stuart Baker » Mon May 21, 2012 7:51 pm

Renegadenemo wrote:Considering all the crazy rules for disposing of this and that - how d'you get rid of 50,000 litres of unwanted green gunk? I bet it attracted every fruit fly and wasp for a hundred miles around too...


Call it Olympic slime and put it on eBay? :mrgreen:

Probably the wrong place for me to rant about it but I don't understand how LOCOG thought it would be ok to sell torches for half what they cost and allow people to sell them on for phenomenal sums and pocket the difference. I know the first seller is giving the money to a charity, but we, the tax paying British public, own those torches. Rant over.
Stuart Baker
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:56 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Bluebird Rebuild

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot] and 0 guests